“The Horse Shoe Philosophy” borrowed from Wikidedia

 

The horseshoe theory is a political concept positing that the extreme left and extreme right, rather than being opposites on a linear spectrum, bend toward each other to resemble a horseshoe, sharing more in common with each other—such as authoritarian tendencies and populism—than with the political center

. 

Key Aspects of Horseshoe Theory:

• Origin: Attributed to French writer Jean-Pierre Faye in the early 2000s, who argued that, like in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, extreme ideologies often employ similar tactics to seize and maintain power.
• Similar Tactics: Both ends of the spectrum often utilize silencing of dissent, dehumanization of opponents, anti-establishment rhetoric, and populism.
• Convergence: The theory suggests that as political movements become more extreme, they adopt similar strategies and viewpoints, effectively bringing them closer together.
• Opposition to Moderation: Both far-left and far-right actors frequently target the moderate, centrist, or "liberal" establishment, treating them as their primary opposition. 

Criticisms of the Theory:

• Ideological Differences: Critics argue that the core beliefs and ultimate goals of the far-left (e.g., equality) and far-right (e.g., hierarchy/nationalism) are fundamentally different, despite similar tactics.
• Over-simplification: Many political scientists view the theory as a simplified, often centrist, narrative that ignores the complexities of political ideology.
• Lack of Evidence: Critics point out that it often relies on anecdotal examples rather than systematic, empirical research. 

See also: Fishhook theory, which suggests only the far-right bends toward the center, while the left does not.