Some people are allowed to say things that are competely useful to them but are completely and utterly false.
It's interesting that when citizens of totalitarian countries, North Korea in this case, escape to Democratic countries like South Korea, the totalitarians say they were kidnapped. The South Koreans say they want to defect. Who to believe?
The truth may not be recoverable as long as each party claims their side of the story. It doesn't matter what the escapees say. Their responses could have been coerced.
This is an important issue. People die from chemical weapons attacks in Syria and no one claims responsibility...everyone is innocent and points to the other guy. No one is held responsible. It works.
Politicians do the same thing. Remember when Bill Clinton was being accused of consorting with a young intern in the White House and Hillary said the accusations were a "Right Wing Conspiracy"? She knew her husband was guilty and still laid that lie down as if they were morally untarnished and Monica was a lying tramp. In the end his half truth of "I never had sex with that woman" because oral sex is not sex, just to refresh your memory of a miserable moment in time for our country, stood as a good enough stopping point for the Democrats.
The lies that flowed from the White House and Hillary as Secretary Of State after Benghazi were more disinformation...sophomoric as they were. Everyone knows she and President Obama tried to color this thing so that no responsibility would be cast upon them. This is another example of even with astounding evidence of the reality of what happened, where the truth cannot be questioned except by sheer audacity, people are allowed to get away with causing terrible things to happen to good people without punishment...without consequences.
Sometimes withholding information is just as bad as laying down a lie to hide the truth. When our government gives something to a cast of Americans or immigrants, that something must be taken from someone else. That is true of money, rights...pretty much anything. This is written in stone. When they create an entitlement they really should express the cost of the new policy, source of the funding, and how it will effect the overall financial health of the country. Some of this information cannot be determined precisely or generally. That information should be expressed as well. Withholding it leaves the peoples' representatives as well as the people themselves unable to make intelligent decisions. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said of the ACA, "Let's pass it so we can see what's in it!". That is an example of a politician whose intelligence has peaked and dwindled, leaving only the "Democrat/Tax and Spend" cult member in it's place.
It's interesting that when citizens of totalitarian countries, North Korea in this case, escape to Democratic countries like South Korea, the totalitarians say they were kidnapped. The South Koreans say they want to defect. Who to believe?
The truth may not be recoverable as long as each party claims their side of the story. It doesn't matter what the escapees say. Their responses could have been coerced.
This is an important issue. People die from chemical weapons attacks in Syria and no one claims responsibility...everyone is innocent and points to the other guy. No one is held responsible. It works.
Politicians do the same thing. Remember when Bill Clinton was being accused of consorting with a young intern in the White House and Hillary said the accusations were a "Right Wing Conspiracy"? She knew her husband was guilty and still laid that lie down as if they were morally untarnished and Monica was a lying tramp. In the end his half truth of "I never had sex with that woman" because oral sex is not sex, just to refresh your memory of a miserable moment in time for our country, stood as a good enough stopping point for the Democrats.
The lies that flowed from the White House and Hillary as Secretary Of State after Benghazi were more disinformation...sophomoric as they were. Everyone knows she and President Obama tried to color this thing so that no responsibility would be cast upon them. This is another example of even with astounding evidence of the reality of what happened, where the truth cannot be questioned except by sheer audacity, people are allowed to get away with causing terrible things to happen to good people without punishment...without consequences.
Sometimes withholding information is just as bad as laying down a lie to hide the truth. When our government gives something to a cast of Americans or immigrants, that something must be taken from someone else. That is true of money, rights...pretty much anything. This is written in stone. When they create an entitlement they really should express the cost of the new policy, source of the funding, and how it will effect the overall financial health of the country. Some of this information cannot be determined precisely or generally. That information should be expressed as well. Withholding it leaves the peoples' representatives as well as the people themselves unable to make intelligent decisions. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said of the ACA, "Let's pass it so we can see what's in it!". That is an example of a politician whose intelligence has peaked and dwindled, leaving only the "Democrat/Tax and Spend" cult member in it's place.
No comments:
Post a Comment